Former Ivory Coast President Laurent Gbagbo will keep behind bars after prosecutors appealed in opposition to his acquittal on fees of crimes in opposition to humanity.
The Worldwide Felony Court docket (ICC) in The Hague acquitted him on Tuesday and ordered his speedy launch.
However on Wednesday prosecutors challenged the choice to launch him, arguing that Mr Gbagbo would possibly abscond.
They stated he won’t seem in courtroom if his acquittal had been to be overturned.
Mr Gbagbo had been charged with crimes in opposition to humanity in reference to violence following a disputed 2010 election that left three,000 useless and 500,000 displaced.
He was captured in 2011 in a presidential palace bunker by UN and French-backed forces supporting his rival, Alassane Ouattara.
He’s the primary former head of state to go on trial on the ICC.
- What does this mean for the ICC?
- Laurent Gbagbo: Ivory Coast’s defiant ‘Cicero’
- Africa live: Loud cheers greet Gbagbo acquittal
“Pending the choice of the appeals chamber on this prosecutor’s request [Mr Gbagbo] shall stay in ICC custody,” a spokesman for the courtroom stated in an announcement.
“There’s a concrete threat that, as soon as launched, the accused is not going to seem for the continuation of the continuing,” prosecutors wrote in a submitting.
A ruling on their enchantment is anticipated on Thursday.
What was Mr Gbagbo accused of?
The violence in Ivory Coast, the world’s largest cocoa producer, got here after Mr Gbagbo refused to simply accept that he had misplaced a disputed election run-off to Mr Ouattara in 2010.
The 5 months of violence that adopted had been described as among the most brutal clashes the nation had ever seen.
Throughout the political stand-off there have been bloody clashes and focused killings in Abidjan within the south, and several other hundred had been massacred within the western city of Duekoue.
Prosecutors stated Mr Gbagbo clung to energy “by all means” and charged him with 4 counts of crimes in opposition to humanity, homicide, rape and different types of sexual violence, persecution and “different inhuman acts”.
He denied the costs, which he stated had been politically motivated.
ICC judges dominated on Tuesday that prosecutors had didn’t reveal “the existence of a ‘widespread plan’ to maintain Mr Gbagbo in energy” which included crimes in opposition to civilians.
Presiding Choose Cuno Tarfusser stated the prosecution had additionally “didn’t reveal that public speeches by Mr Gbagbo constituted ordering or inducing the alleged crimes”.
Is his acquittal a blow to the ICC?
“Every time a case involving mass atrocities primarily collapses on the ICC, it does injury to the notion of the courtroom as a reputable and efficient establishment of worldwide justice,” Mark Kersten, author of Justice in Conflict, advised the BBC’s Anna Holligan.
“Many are involved that the courtroom is rising as an establishment the place solely rebels may be efficiently prosecuted,” he added.
The prosecution on the ICC has additionally failed in its makes an attempt to construct profitable circumstances in opposition to former DR Congo Vice-President Jean-Pierre Bemba, and Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta.
However, the ruling demonstrates the judges’ independence and impartiality and makes it more durable to push the narrative, widespread amongst those that concern the lengthy arm of the ICC, that the courtroom is a biased weapon of neo-colonial justice used purely to convict African leaders, our correspondent says.